Justice in America The AJ Pontillo story…….

A bail bondsman who was acquitted of fraud and kidnapping for extortion has filed a claim with Stanislaus County and the cities of Modesto and Ceres seeking tens of thousands of dollars in damages. He claimed law enforcement agencies violated his civil rights.

The three claims were filed on behalf of Aleo John Pontillo earlier this month. Officials said the claims were still being reviewed. If rejected, the claims are a likely precursor to a civil lawsuit.

Pontillo alleged that the Stanislaus County District Attorney’s Office and Sheriff’s Department conducted defamation efforts against him for several years through the conclusion of his trial. The bail bondsman claimed these agencies and other law enforcement officials associated with the investigation falsely arrested Pontillo and maliciously prosecuted him.

Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson and District Attorney Birgit Fladager declined to comment about Pontillo’s civil claims.

Pontillo said he was a victim of retaliatory prosecution after he submitted public complaints about the investigation before he was arrested.

The claims, filed by Pontillo’s Vallejo-based attorney Tim Pori, each indicate he is seeking at least $25,000 in damages. But the final amount will be determined through further investigation.

Pontillo, owner of AJ’s Bail Bonds in Modesto, was arrested in September 2011. He was accused of holding clients against their will at the business on Yosemite Boulevard to get payments from them. He also was accused of conspiring with employees in bail-forfeiture fraud.

Nearly half of the criminal allegations against Pontillo were dropped by the court after some evidence surfaced during his trial. In December, a jury acquitted Pontillo of the remaining charges.

Pontillo presumably filed claims against Modesto and Ceres because the investigation into Pontillo involved law enforcement officials or other resources from those cities. At one point, federal officials took the lead in the investigation, using a federally funded task force of local gang investigators to serve search warrants at Pontillo’s business and home.

The filed claims indicate local law enforcement officials conducted a multimillion-dollar investigation based on conspiracies generated by a police informant and an investigator with the District Attorney’s Office seeking to defame Pontillo. The investigation began in early 2007.

On Dec. 23, 2008, law enforcement officials served a search warrant at the AJ’s Bail Bonds office. Investigators served a second search warrant at the business on Feb. 3, 2010. The claims indicate Pontillo and three employees were handcuffed and put on display in the front office.

A month later, Pontillo filed complaints about the investigation with the state’s attorney general’s office and the Stanislaus County civil grand jury. Both complaints were denied and no further investigation was conducted.

Pontillo that year also filed a complaint against Fladager with the State Bar of California for the second search warrant served at his business. About two months later, the State Bar closed Pontillo’s complaint without taking action against Fladager, according to the filed claims.

After his 2011 arrest, Pontillo said his bail was set at $2 million based on false declaration drafted by the prosecutor, and he was placed in a cell for inmates with tuberculosis and other problems. He said he tried to ask jail officials why he was housed in such a cell and if he could be moved to another cell, but he received no response.

Pontillo was later released on $1.3 million bail and remained out of custody throughout his trial. He said he was charged with $130,000 bail premium.

If you refer back to my series of stories on AJ, Pay special attention to who was identified as the informer known by me as the COPSUCKER. Documentation to follow as the the legal papers filed against her and why.

Apple Purges Confederate Flags, But Leaves Swastikas And Nazis Alone

A day after Apple began the mass purge of applications depicting the Confederate flag, the Nazi Swastika is still standing prominently in some games. The choice to ban a symbol of slavery from historical games, but not of mass genocide, reveals how tech companies struggle to apply hate speech guidelinesoften with strange inconsistency. At the moment, Apple allows me kill Nazis but not Confederate generals.

Apple reportedly began removing apps and games that display the Confederate flag from its store, in response to recent public pressure to remove the infamous Civil War symbol from businesses and state houses. The tech giant has even banned popular Civil War re-enactment games that display the flag in historical context, such as Civil War 1863.

Hunting Nazis in Wolfenstein

“We are writing to notify you that your app has been removed from the App Store because it includes images of the Confederate flag used in offensive and mean-spirited ways,” wrote Apple to the director of these Civil War Games, Andrew Mulholland, according to gaming blog Kotaku (I could not find the game in the app store as of this writing).

Maxim Zasov of Game Labs, a developer of the Civil War Game Ultimate General: Gettysburg explained in a statement why he would not remove the flag to comply with Apple’s new rules.

We receive a lot of letters of gratitude from American teachers who use our game in history curriculum to let kids experience one of the most important battles in American history from the Commander’s perspective…

Therefore we are not going to amend the game’s content and Ultimate General: Gettysburg will no longer be available on AppStore. We really hope that Apple’s decision will achieve the desired results. We can’t change history, but we can change the future.

Apple, like Facebook and Google, have a long history of restricting speech deemed offensive or hateful. Google famously removed a game simulating the bombing of Gaza and Apple removes “gay cure” apps. In trying to restrict pictures of bare nipples, Facebook has struggled with breastfeeding photos, initially banning them and then later relaxing the policy after criticism.

Tech companies manage an unwieldy volume of user-generated content. The relatively small staff of even very profitable tech companies are vastly outnumbered. Applying algorithms or blanked rules is an efficient way of dealing with problems, but seem to err on the side of censorship over removing hate speech.

Censorship rules are especially problematic as tech companies become the dominate channels for free speech. Ultimately, tech companies are powerful new gatekeepers of the 1st Amendment; their decisions have profound implications.

What a bunch of hypocrites………….

Retro of the day: Ambrosia

Biggest Part of Me” is a song by American soft rock band Ambrosia, from the album One Eighty. Released as a single in 1980, the song reached #3 on both the U.S. Billboard Hot 100[1] and Adult Contemporary charts. The song was written by band member David Pack.

Weekly singles charts[edit]

Chart (1980)


Canadian RPM Top Singles


US Billboard Hot 100


US Adult Contemporary[2]


US Cash Box Top 100[3]


Year-end charts[edit]

Chart (1980)


US Billboard [4]


US Cash Box [5]