Sounds like the prosecution’s direct bored the jury, but the defense’s cross ex was interesting to them, especially with all the Klingon type responses.
My experience has shown that things like funny responses weigh far more heavily to a jury than a lot of technical mumbo jumbo does. Juries tend to gravitate toward the evidence they can easily understand. They can easily understand that Jim Cook is hiding the ball.
It was very interesting tonight
iS THAT GOOD OR BAD?
Sounds like the prosecution’s direct bored the jury, but the defense’s cross ex was interesting to them, especially with all the Klingon type responses.
My experience has shown that things like funny responses weigh far more heavily to a jury than a lot of technical mumbo jumbo does. Juries tend to gravitate toward the evidence they can easily understand. They can easily understand that Jim Cook is hiding the ball.
Live Long and Prosper.
Beam me up Scotty