FRANK CARSON et al UPDATE…….


JUDGE MOODY’S RULING ON A MOTION BY THE DEFENSE

AMERICAN TOURISTS ATTACKED WITH ACID IN FRANCE……..

POLICE SAY NOT TERRROR RELATED


 Four young American women were attacked with acid Sunday in the French city of Marseille by a woman who has been arrested, the Marseille prosecutor’s office said.

Two of the tourists were injured in the face in the attack in the city’s main Saint Charles train station and one of them has a possible eye injury, a spokeswoman for the Marseille prosecutor’s office told The Associated Press in a phone call.

She said all four of the women, who are in their 20s, have been hospitalized, two of them for shock.

The spokeswoman said the 41-year-old female suspect did not make any extremist threats or declarations during the attack. She said there were no obvious indications that the woman’s actions were terror-related, but added that officials could not be 100 percent sure about ruling out terror links at such an early stage of the investigation.

The spokeswoman spoke on condition of anonymity, per the custom of the French judicial system.

She did not release any further details about the suspects or the victims, including where in the United States the tourists were from.

Read more Here

DAWG WANTS…….1 MILLION ROUND PER MINUTE GUN (VIDEO)

DON’T FORGET XMAS IS RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER…….

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE REDUCING PENALTIES FOR HIV PATIENTS WHO DELIBERATLY SPREAD THE VIRUS (INCLUDING DONATING BLOOD)…….


CALIFORNIA SB 239

Enrolled  September 13, 2017
Passed  IN  Senate  September 11, 2017
Passed  IN  Assembly  September 07, 2017
Amended  IN  Assembly  August 28, 2017
Amended  IN  Assembly  June 21, 2017
Amended  IN  Senate  May 26, 2017
Amended  IN  Senate  April 04, 2017
Amended  IN  Senate  March 21, 2017

SCOTT WIENER


 

Introduced by Senator Wiener
(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Gloria)
(Coauthors: Senators Atkins, Mitchell, and Skinner)
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Chiu, Eggman, and Gipson)

(1) Existing law makes it a felony punishable by imprisonment for 3, 5, or 8 years in the state prison to expose another person to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by engaging in unprotected sexual activity when the infected person knows at the time of the unprotected sex that he or she is infected with HIV, has not disclosed his or her HIV-positive status, and acts with the specific intent to infect the other person with HIV. Existing law makes it a felony punishable by imprisonment for 2, 4, or 6 years for any person to donate blood, tissue, or, under specified circumstances, semen or breast milk, if the person knows that he or she has acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), or that he or she has tested reactive to HIV. Existing law provides that a person who is afflicted with a contagious, infectious, or communicable disease who willfully exposes himself or herself to another person, or any person who willfully exposes another person afflicted with the disease to someone else, is guilty of a misdemeanor.

This bill would repeal those provisions. The bill would instead make the intentional transmission of an infectious or communicable disease, as defined, a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than 6 months if certain circumstances apply, including that the defendant knows he or she or a 3rd party is afflicted with the disease, that the defendant acts with the specific intent to transmit or cause an afflicted 3rd party to transmit the disease to another person, that the defendant or the afflicted 3rd party engages in conduct that poses a substantial risk of transmission, as defined, that the defendant or the afflicted 3rd party transmits the disease to the other person, and if the exposure occurs through interaction with the defendant and not a 3rd party, that the person exposed to the disease during voluntary interaction with the defendant did not know that the defendant was afflicted with the disease. The bill would also make it a misdemeanor to attempt to intentionally transmit an infectious and communicable disease, as specified, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than 90 days. This bill would make willful exposure to an infectious or communicable disease, as defined, a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than 6 months, and would prohibit a health officer, or a health officer’s designee, from issuing a maximum of 2 instructions to a defendant that would result in a violation of this provision. The bill would impose various requirements upon the court in order to prevent the public disclosure of the identifying characteristics, as defined, of the complaining witness and the defendant. By creating new crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Read bill HERE

NOTE: THESE ARE JUST THE FIRST TWO PARAGRAPHS OF THE BILL THAT IS A TERRIBLE IDEA…….

CLINT SAYS…….

051517_0331_Clintsays1.jpg

Nurse came in and said Doc,

there’s a man in the waiting room

who thinks he’s invisible,

what should I tell him?

The doctor said Tell him

I can’t see him today

WARREN YATES COMMENTARY…….

COMEUPPANCE


By Warren Yates

9-15-2017

As a disclaimer for my commentaries, I wish to go on record as I have in numerous other commentaries that have been posted. I spent 27 years in law enforcement and fully support all legitimate and unbiased law enforcement in our country, state, county and city dedicated men and women who put their lives on the line 24 hours a day to protect us. The four keywords in my commentaries are “legitimate”, “dedicated”, “ethical” and “unbiased”. I totally reject an agenda driven prosecution whose sole purpose is not to find justice, but to decimate the lives, reputations and physical well-being of innocent people.

I wholeheartedly support all of law enforcement who performs their duties in a legitimate, dedicated, ethical and unbiased way. I would estimate that that covers 98 to 99% of our law enforcement communities. I have many friends in law enforcement and know that they all espouse those qualities.

September 15, 2017 – Consistent with the time I am allowed away from my pending caseload and a couple of days of being sick, I have been able to be in the courtroom on the Scott McFarland and Eduardo Quintinar preliminary hearing Tuesday and Wednesday. These two days I’ve had a lot of time devoted to listening to wiretap recordings of Scott and Eddie’s phones. Not very much gathered from those.

I have been endeavoring in my rookie journalistic efforts to bring out information regarding the Frank Carson 8 case that you would not read in the Modesto bee. As a matter of fact there has been no reporter from the Modesto bee anywhere near the preliminary has been going on for Scott and Eddie. It would make one think that the editor of the Modesto bee as a shock collar around the neck of Rosalio and now when he gets near a courthouse he gets shocked and flees the scene.

But that’s not all bad, it’s probably better to get the facts from people who sit in the courtroom regularly instead of the touch and go reporting done by Rosalio which has caused most of his articles to bomb. Much like our political climate today, you can watch the media to get all your fake news or, watch Fox News and gets the truth. So here you can read the fake news from the local rag or read the real news from our commentaries.

While listening to Ferreira it appears that she cannot talk in the normal tone. She has to raise her voice as if to make an impact statement or just screech a little bit which reminds me of a person running their fingernails down a chalkboard. Actually I guess I would probably rather hear the fingernails down the chalkboard.

While listening to some of the wiretap phone conversations, Eddie on a phone call to either his Sgt. or Lieut. was asking them how he can put a stop to the harassment that Cap’n Crunch Bunch and probably Baby Huey (Don’t mention domestic violence around me) Evers has been perpetrating. Their conduct is abominable and they should have been disciplined or fired for violations of the civil rights of the Quintinars and many others.

The worst offender is Cap’n Crunch Bunch who started out by sending harassing emails to her on her work computer. He has absolutely no right or authority to harass someone who is not a person of interest or a suspect in this case. But he doesn’t care. He’ll care one day I’m sure. Then, as if that wasn’t enough, Cap’n Crunch Bunch and probably Jon (Don’t mention domestic violence to me) Evers went to Eddie’s home while Eddie was on duty and knocked on the door. (It is believed to have been Baby Huey Evers because Eddie’s wife stated that as this huge guy approached she thought there was a solar eclipse because the sun was totally blocked out by an enormous hunk of ….).

Cap’n Crunch Bunch was knocking on the door and when she opened it and saw who it was, she shut the door in their face. Cap’n Crunch Bunch then began telling her that we have to talk to you and she stated she doesn’t want to talk to them. So with that, Capt. Crunch Bunch has the unmitigated gall, unadulterated impudence and asinine audacity tell her that Eddie has been lying to her in this situation and that he is going to arrest Eddie. So here we have an out of control, raving, crazed and frenzied person with a badge and a gun with a careless, willful and wanton disregard for her civil rights and the sanctity of their home.

What makes Cap’n Crunch Bunches egregious and illegal conduct much more reprehensible is the fact that the Quintinar’s young daughter was there with her mother and heard the rantings and ravings of a certified nutcase saying that her father was lying to her mother and that her father was going to be arrested. Words cannot begin to describe what trashy gutter tripe behavior Cap’n Crunch Bunch exhibited. And again, this unhinged illegal and scum sucking conduct by Cap’n Crunch Bunch should have caused him to get fired. Once Mrs. Quintinar told the slimeball that she didn’t want to talk to him, he should have turned his sorry a**around and the left without further opening his mouth.

Bunch no doubt violated confidentiality and could have compromised the “witchhunt” investigation that fladager started in order to try to put her nemesis, Frank Carson in prison behind charges relied upon by the testimony of scum bag felons, soon to be scum bag felons, meth heads, potheads, embezzlers, thieves, dope dealers, perjurers, burglars and other assorted dregs of society. As I said before several of my commentaries, fladager’s motto is: if you can’t beat em, book em. She is trying to get rid of Frank Carson by any means necessary.

And listening to the conversation of Mrs. Quintinar’s recorded called to Eddie, she is crying because of the trauma that was inflicted upon her and their young daughter by an overzealous nutcase. During the conversation, she continually asked Eddie why he lied to her. He had not lied to her but that lowlife slithering snake nutcase told her that he had. I will say it again that Crunch Bunch should not be allowed to carry not only a badge but for sure not a gun. If you do some research on his career in Pittsburg California and over here you might understand why.

I HAVE SEEN THE “LETTER” KIRK!!!

After hearing that recorded phone call and that champion of justice Cap’n Crunch Bunch tell Eddie’s wife that he was lying to her made me immediately flash back to some of the liars that the prosecution in the Frank Carson case has brought forward as witnesses. Of course, we expect all the scum bag witnesses presented by the prosecution to lie in order to receive a lighter sentence, a dismissal of their case or being granted special considerations if incarcerated. And it is not just PUKE scumbags who are lying. Many of the liars wear a badge and call themselves law enforcement officers. Their conduct is enough to gag a maggot.

So let’s go back in time as I remind you of some of the prevarications of Mr. perfect Cap’n Crunch Bunch and some of his gang. Actually, I should say “Marlissa’s Mauraders and fladager’s minions”.

August 8, 2016 – Here we get into Cap’n Crunch Bunch committing perjury, whoops I mean being “incorrect “as you will see. When asked again by Hans Hjertonsson if he had said that Brian Woody had said that Baljit Athwal was doing security, Bunch admitted that he had said that on the stand. Bunch looked destroyed on the stand at this time. Bunch admits that his testimony was “Incorrect” about Robert Woody, Daljit Atwal, and Baljit Athwal being on the Carson property that night.

Incorrect? When I was a kid, if I broke a window by a bad throw with a baseball and when asked by my dad if I did it, and I said no or I didn’t recall as most of the prosecution’s witnesses seem to say. Then when dad would say well Mrs. Smith saw you do it and I would then say oh, sorry dad, I was “incorrect”. After I had my butt beat, my dad would have said that’s for being incorrect or as we know the real word “LYING”.

So let me get this straight. If I am on the witness stand under oath, and when asked a question and I said no and it was shown that I was lying, I could just say that my answer was incorrect and I wouldn’t face any ramifications for lying on the witness stand. Let me tell you folks, if any of us were on the witness stand and gave false testimony you better believe would be charged with perjury. But not Special Agent Bunch. They can try playing games with semantics but the bottom line is, he was lying.

Just so we don’t leave anybody out, Cap’n Crunch Bunch isn’t the only person who lies in court. Let’s see if we remember this episode when Ferreira blatantly lied in court and got caught. Any ramifications? NONE!!! So, let’s review anyway:

March 13, 2016Now wait a minute, you not to tell me that Ferreira lied during this hearing are you? You better bet your sweet bippy I am as follows: Then we get on to Ms. Ferreira’s claim that no deals have been made for any of these star prosecution witnesses. Earlier in the hearing a person by the name of Ronald Glenn Cooper Junior was brought from Pleasant Valley State Prison to testify for the prosecution. Again, Ms. Ferreira states that there were no deals made. Well let me insert a comment from one of my earlier commentaries regarding that:

But this morning we had the pleasure of listening to Deputy District Attorney Elizabeth de Jong as she took the stand to defend the DEAL made to potential three striker Ronald Glenn Cooper Junior. She was certainly doing the “Nae Nae” dance in response to the defense attorneys questions why a deal was cut to let Mr. Cooper, a fine broth of a lad by the way, get 4 years on what would have been a three strikes case. After all, all he did was break into a house, apparently steal something, terrorize a female and stick a knife up to her throat and terrorize her. He pled to inflicting corporal punishment on a spouse co-habitant.

Now comes Deputy Public Defender Benjamin Rosenstein who apparently has no problem in telling the truth. He represents both Ronald Cooper Junior and Michael Cooley. And right out of the gate Mr. Rosenstein states that both of his clients are promised leniency in their unrelated cases. THIS MAKES FERREIRA A BALD FACED PERJURER!!! LIER IN OTHER WORDS!!!


After being embarrassed in court, Ferreira really got her panties in a wad. In a hysterically funny attempt to wipe that egg off of her face that she got earlier that morning after eating a McDonald’s Egg McMuffin or three, she immediately tries to attack Mr. Rosenstein’s professional capabilities. When liars get caught in the act they try to deflect or rationalize their lies. Exempli gratia:

Immediately after hearing this truth, Dist. Atty. Ferreira immediately begins to attack Mr. Rosenstein saying is only been an attorney since 2012. And that is mainly been in one court and that is no way Mr. Rosenstein could know if all local prosecutors always ask defense attorneys to request continuances Obviously Mr. Rosenstein said something that ruffled the feathers of the Dist. Atty.

It is so refreshing to have a county employee who is not afraid to tell the truth. I commend Mr. Rosenstein for his candor and honesty. I certainly trust that Mr. Rosenstein will not be castigated, criticized, coerced or compromised in any way because of his courage and wanting to set the record straight. We here in Stanislaus County know that there’s a powerful political machine we have to contend with. Thank you Mr. Rosenstein for your service to the citizens of Stanislaus County. This young man has more integrity and search for the truth in his little finger then Ferreira has in her whole body. Just saying…


Getting back to Cap’n Crunch Bunch Ferreira’s sock puppet, if you take the time to research the court records on the cases of Carmen Sabatino, AJ Pontillo, Frank Drummond and the Carson 8, you will be able to see his unpredictable and erratic behavior demonstrated in untruthful police reports, intimidation, prevarication, waving a gun around and other highly irregular behavior. Let’s go over a couple of these with examples.

UNTRUTHFUL POLICE REPORTS:

Excerpt from June 5, 2016: Now a little about the Ramey Warrant that the Dist. Atty. had to judge shop to find one who would sign it. Robert Forkner then asked Special Agent Bunch if one of the witnesses named Paden (Spelling ?) Called him and told him that the information on the Ramey warrant was incorrect and Special Agent Bunch answered yes. He was then asked if he had told Mr. Paden about the black BMW and Special Agent Bunch answered no. Special Agent Bunch was asked if Mr. Paden accused law enforcement of false information in the Ramey warrant and Special Agent Bunch said yes but Mr. Paden was mistaken. Hmmmn? ReallyReally? Special Agent Bunch. Of course, what does a citizen know? (Does trying to worm your way out of something sound familiar?)

Excerpt from August 23, 2016: The fact that the information about the polygraph was not brought out immediately was now called by the Dist. Atty. a “huge inadvertent mishap“. That’s a term that is likened to the term that was used when Special Agent Bunch was caught lying on the stand. Then that was referred to as “incorrect” rather than what it should have been, perjury.

So now instead of a Brady violation the semantics coming out of the District Attorney’s Office now call a Brady violation a “huge inadvertent mishap“. Looking at it that way I see several persons, places or things in the courtroom that could be called a “huge inadvertent mishap“. If you get my drift. JUST SAYING…

That is very interesting. Under the DAs theory and logic or lack thereof, Edward J Smith, Captain of the Titanic did not really ignore the iceberg warnings of possible impending doom, but rather the sinking of the Titanic was just a huge inadvertent mishap”.

INTIMIDATION:

March 19, 2016
As I stated in a prior commentary, Bunch, Navarro and Evers entered Frank Carson’s office as law enforcement personnel. They entered without an arrest warrant or a search warrant. Either Bunch or Navarro stated that they wanted to ask him some questions. At this point they were still law enforcement officers. Frank Carson did not wish to talk to them and told them to “Get out”! At that point they should have turned around and left his office immediately.

He told them numerous times to “Get out”. When they refused to leave they shed their aura of law enforcement officers and became jackbooted Nazi thugs. They trampled on Frank Carson’s constitutional rights hoping he would resist them in some manner. But Frank Carson outsmarted them and avoided falling into their trap. It was only after Frank Carson called 911 and continued to yell at them to get out, that they finally retreated and got the hell out.

During the armed invasion of Frank Carson’s office by Bunch, Navarro and Evers, Bunch and Navarro while harassing Frank Carson in his conference room made sure that Frank Carson knew they were armed as Frank Carson reported in his call to 911. I decided to do a little research on people who advertise that they are armed with a gun rather than in fact appear unarmed and their motivation for doing so.

Having breezed through a couple of articles on Psychiatric Times, I found a couple of articles interesting.:

Freud and Jung offered some basic interpretations. For instance, in their shape, guns can be an obvious phallic symbol. – See more at:

http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/blogs/psychology-guns

Men, whether intentional or not, tend to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious. From a very early age, men are taught that guns are a manly-man guy thing. Hunting and shooting are manly activities, we’re told, and any dude who’s packing heat is a total badass because guns are badass.”

Especially if you are a DA investigator. I wonder what caliber Cap’n Crunch Bunch thinks his is? Just saying…

March 4, 2016 – I reported on the incident in which Bunch and Evers went to interview Baljit, here is an excerpt from it:

“Earlier this morning when Detective Evers was testifying he mentioned a time when he and Special Agent Bunch went to the PopNCork to interview Baljit. I am not sure if it was Baljit Atwal or Baljit Athwal since the Dist. Atty. cannot get his name straight on their court paperwork. So we’ll just presume that it’s Mr. Athwal since he’s the one in custody now but not by that name.

As Detective Evers and Special Agent Bunch began to talk to Baljit, Baljit took out his telephone and began to record the interview. When Special Agent Bunch and Evers saw that, Special Agent Bunch said “You know that’s illegal to do that?”. Being confronted by two law enforcement officers one being very large in stature and knowing if they had a badge they had guns, Baljit became intimidated by their authoritarian bearing. Baljit immediately turned his phone off and stopped recording not knowing what to expect from these two if he did not stop”.

We saw recently in the presidential debates that there was some mention of the size of a man’s hands in relation to another part of his body. Some people state that the guys that drive those high lifted pickup trucks whose headlights go over the roof of your car are inadequate in one manner or another. Does at least one member of this all-American marauding task force own a pickup a similar description? You have to figure those things out for yourself. Just saying…

June 27, 2016 I was appalled at the conduct afforded Mr. Samra by the Dist. Atty. staff. I was in law enforcement for 27 years, 19 years here in Stanislaus County and have never seen such underhanded, unethical and lowdown tactics as exhibited by the District Attorney’s Office against Mr. Samra. When you read what they did you need to be very angry with the District Attorney’s Office for their ethics destroying actions and worried that they could do this to you or your family.

There is no question that Investigator Bunch had knowledge of the warrant outstanding for Mr. Samra when they went to his residence and made contact with him. While interviewing him and telling him what he should do when defense attorney Forkner talks to him and then saying“We were never here and this never happened” smacks of egregious misconduct. Both Ferreira and Bunch were there in the effort to intimidate Mr. Samra.


Then in court when Mr. Samra’s testimony was not favorable to the prosecution, all of a sudden the deputy district attorney Ferreira blurts out, “you have a warrant don’t you? “and Mr. Samra is arrested. YOU DON’T GET MUCH MORE LOW LIFE THEN THAT! The judge brought everyone into chambers and admonished the district attorney. How would you like a member of your family to be victimized like this by the top law enforcement officer in Stanislaus County. This is sad, so very sad. So everyone of needs to beware of snakes in the grass disguised as law enforcement personnel. SHAMEFUL!!

THESE CLOWNS HISTORIES ARE FULL OF INTIMIDATION OF CITIZENS AND BUSINESS OWNERS. WITH FERREIRA BEING OUT IN TURLOCK AT MR. SAMRA’S BUSINESS WITH BUNCH, INTIMIDATION IS SHARED BY MANY OF THOSE IN THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE!

But this type of behavior is nothing new to Cap’n Crunch Bunch and Baby Huey don’t mention domestic violence around me Evers. I called it Jack booted thug behavior patterned after the Nazi brownshirts. The SA (Sturmabteilung or Storm Detachment) was better known as the Brownshirts or Storm Troopers. The SA got their nickname from the color of the shirts they wore. According to the Nuremberg Military Tribunal, the SA was made up of “ruffians” and “bullies”. However, it played a very important role in the first years of the Nazi Party.

We do not have a Nazi party here in the Stanislaus County District Attorney’s Office. We have fladager’s Follies whose minions trample upon the civil rights of others, no moral turpitude, ruining lives, running around like a young bull in a cow pasture nailing everybody he/she can, with no regard for ethics, morals, common decency and without any moral compass present. All with the blessings of the district attorney in her quest to destroy Frank Carson because she can’t win against him in court. The description in the prior paragraph aptly describes this band of ruffians and bullies.

And the bullying goes on. I was advised yesterday outside of the courthouse by Frank Carson that Kirk Bunch and threatened him in the hallway. There is going to be in order to show cause motion filed next week in an attempt to try to rein in some of Bunches egregious abuse of authority and intimidation of witnesses and defendants. The district attorney is scraping the bottom of the barrel in an attempt to try to salvage a win from this witch hunt she has embarked upon. I might suggest that if she’s looking for witch, she might try a mirror. Again, you should know that fladager is so confident in the Carson 8 case that she has never ever set foot into the courtroom. Judge Zuniga as made mention of that several times. I wouldn’t either if I had pulled some of the lowlife stunts she has.

cook

Well on Wednesday it comes “Telemonkey” Jim Cook Avenue boy “Cheeta”. SOS different day. Old Jimmy boy is very responsive to all of Ferreira’s questions and he and Cheeta are all smiles and grinning like the cat that ate the canary. I could see the color roll Jimmy boy’s eyes because instead of pupils there were dollar signs. The problem pulling down about 90K for their expertise, ha ha. So he goes through about 90 slides proving just about nothing and then it’s time for the defense to cross examine. One attorney Alonzo Gradford began asking for certain records involving his presentation, old Jungle Jim repeatedly on numerous occasions said that “I don’t have the necessary records here today”.

So, let me get this straight Jimmy boy and Cheeta: you have the necessary records to answer all of Ferreira’s questions with no problem. Isn’t that convenient? Now when the defense attorneys begin to ask questions about his records, he constantly answered he doesn’t have the necessary records here TODAY. Jimmy, you mental midget, where in Sam Hill did you think you were coming? To a mad Hatter’s Tea Party? Jimmy, you bought off piece of crap. You don’t have evidence that might be exculpatory but you have everything Ferreira needs. YOU ARE A BIG BOUGHT AND PAID FOR JACKASS!

Which was further evidenced with your kindergarten style flashcards, you and all of fladager’s sock puppets and minions did not have enough brains check out and find out that during that month lapse of calls between Scott and O’Keefe was because O’Keefe had been deployed in the National Guard during that time. If brains were dynamite none of you would have enough to blow your nose. Another case of Jungle Jim showing his imbecilic tendencies. Hey Jimmy boy. Gotta little egg on your face. Maybe you and Marlissa both had Egg McMuffins. Just saying…

Let’s just have a little recap here regarding Telemonkey Cook’s expertise and competency:

July 17, 2016 I did a little checking online I located a case that ole Jimmy testified in Santa Clara County. It was a murder case and I am showing a page from the Palo Alto Times that appeared regarding that case.

Cook, a former AT&T field representative who now trains law-enforcement officials on analyzing wireless devices, presented the jury in Zumot’s murder-arson trial Friday with detailed spreadsheets listing all calls and text messages made and received by Zumot and Schipsi, including ones they exchanged between themselves.

He also produced a series of maps illustrating the coverage areas of the towers the two cell phones used between the evening of Oct. 14 and the evening of Oct. 15.

Cook’s testimony was instantly disputed by Zumot’s attorney Mark Geragos, who produced his own AT&T records and argued that the data Cook relied on doesn’t actually exist. Geragos showed the jury the AT&T report listing the call data from the two phones. For the three phone calls in which the two phones appeared to be traveling together, the fields that normally display data for cell towers were blank.

Geragos blasted Cook’s findings and told him to produce the AT&T report on which he based his conclusions. When Cook couldn’t produce that report, Geragos pointed out repeatedly that the numbers Cook was showing the jurors was an Excel spreadsheet that Cook himself had put together — not raw data from the company.

“There isn’t a single record from AT&T that has this cell-tower data,” Geragos said during his cross-examination.

Cook said that while the data was missing in this report, he requested more information from AT&T later. He said all the data he used in his analysis came from AT&T. He also said that he had not read any police reports relating to this case.

Posted by Domanica
a resident of Palo Alto Hills
on Jan 14, 2011 at 11:50 pm
Domanica is a registered user.

You must not of been paying attention to the truth that was said today in court. Well, you did but you dont care for the truth. Mr. Cook was caught in a lie ! Point blank, that’s the truth. He was asked, ” did you make up these spreadsheets” and his answer was YES. Yes , with the look of shame and embarrassment because he was caught.

You did not like the outcome of today’s BLOW to the da’s fabricated case so now you want to take it out on the reporter, for simply doing his job, reporting what happen.

Remember, the truth will always prevail !
GLORY TO GOD !!!

Report Objectionable Content

Email Town Square Modera

So, we know that old Jimmy boy can lie in whatever County he’s in. He doesn’t play any favorites.

I’m going to wrap this up WAIT!! NEWS FLASH: fladager speaking on arrest of illegal alien before court appearance:
The district attorney said her office doesn’t have a practice of advising ICE officials of the immigration status of any defendant or witness. She said prosecutors don’t necessarily know about someone’s immigration status, nor do they normally inquire.

sTAN DA ICE

Why would she start obeying federal law now? She condones and approves of her minions violating citizen’s federal civil rights and also continually violates federal law Brady versus Maryland by withholding exculpatory evidence until she is forced to. In a recent case fladager had to allow a defendant in a murder case to plead to manslaughter because exculpatory evidence was provided to the defense three days before a jury trial was to start. There have been so many exposés of violations of Brady versus Maryland that the DA didn’t want another one popping up. Another example of Brady violation:

April 12, 2017 Modesto Bee: A Stanislaus County judge has postponed a trial in the capital murder case that initially was scheduled to start this week for Mark Edward Mesiti, who is accused of sexually abusing and killing his 14-year-old daughter, Alycia Mesiti.

Superior Court Judge Dawna Reeves has postponed the trial before. In January, Reeves postponed Mesiti’s trial because the defendant, who has chosen to act as his own attorney, wasn’t given sufficient access to a writing surface to properly prepare his defense while in jail.

On Tuesday afternoon, the judge was forced to delay the trial again because a prosecution investigator discovered photos collected as evidence that had not been provided to the defense. The prosecution handed over those photos to the defense last month.

Reeves wanted to give the defense time to review those photos and conduct any needed further investigation, so she decided to reschedule the April 10 trial. Now, the trial is scheduled to begin July 10, 2017 with jury selection. DISCOVERY AFTER 8 YEARS!!

The fact that this defendant may possibly face the death penalty or the possibility of never getting out of prison does not negate his rights under Brady versus Maryland to have all discovery provided in a timely manner. His criminal complaint was filed on June 4, 2009.

He and his attorney are now receiving evidence that have not been provided to the defense. Irrespective of the outcome of his case, had he been convicted earlier, it would appear this would be an appealable case costing the taxpayers tens of thousand dollars if not hundreds of thousands of dollars more to adjudicate because of the Dist. Atty.’s failure to provide all the discovery in a case.

I am going to wrap this up right now and get it out. The next court date for Eddie and Scott is October 18, 2017 but there are several defense motions to be heard prior to that time. So, stay tuned.


CLINT SAYS…….

051517_0331_Clintsays1.jpg

Restrooms now have auto flushes, taps, hand dryers.

But isn’t it silly that you cancel all that by

touching the door handle on your way out?